LUCKYSPIRE

Result · One-Day Internationals

India Cricket vs South Africa Cricket

Venue par · 155Chase success · 58%POTM · AK Markram

Match preview & overview

South Africa chase down 359 in Raipur as Markram ton seals stunning win

South Africa beat India by 4 wickets at the Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Stadium in Raipur on 3 December 2025, chasing down a target of 359 with three centuries shared across the match. India posted 358 for 5 in their 50 overs, built on hundreds from Ruturaj Gaikwad (105 off 83 balls) and Virat Kohli (102 off 93 balls). South Africa's reply was driven by AK Markram, whose 110 off 98 balls earned him the Player of the Match award. It was a closer finish than the margin suggests: South Africa lost 4 wickets for 80 runs in the death overs before crossing the line at 362 for 7.

The match produced three individual centuries, which is exceptionally rare in ODI cricket. All three batters made their contributions in different ways: Gaikwad was the aggressor, Kohli the accumulator, and Markram the chase-anchor. Between them, they turned a match that could have gone either way into two sustained periods of batting dominance.

Pitch report & venue insights

Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh Int'l Stadium, Raipur24-match sample

Aggregate conditions from 2013–2025. Numbers that tend to decide matches at this ground — par score, chase success, powerplay averages and toss bias.

24

T20 matches hosted

155

Avg 1st-innings score

148

Avg 2nd-innings score

58%

Chase success rate

37

Avg powerplay runs

58%

Toss-field rate

Key talking points

Moments the match hinged on

5 angles

Headline angle

Record chase at a ground that rarely sees them

The Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Stadium has a chase success rate of 58% across 24 ODIs, but the average second-innings score here is just 148. South Africa's 362 for 7 was far beyond anything this ground has seen before and reframes what a defendable total looks like at this venue.

Angle 02

Three centuries in a single ODI innings

AK Markram (110 off 98 balls), Ruturaj Gaikwad (105 off 83 balls) and Virat Kohli (102 off 93 balls) all reached three figures in the same match. Two centuries in an ODI is rare enough; three in the same game is exceptionally uncommon at any level.

Angle 03

India's middle overs were decisive for both sides

India scored 218 runs for 2 wickets between overs 11 and 40, laying the platform for 358 for 5. South Africa's middle-overs phase was even more productive: 231 runs for just 2 wickets. Both teams effectively won their middle phases; South Africa won the match.

Angle 04

South Africa's death-overs nerves nearly unravelled the chase

After cruising through the middle overs, South Africa lost 4 wickets for 80 runs in the final ten, compared to India's 1 wicket for 74 in the equivalent phase. The final stages were far tighter than the 4-wicket margin suggests.

Angle 05

Toss decision validated on a batting surface

South Africa won the toss and chose to field, a call supported by the venue's 58% toss-field rate and its historical chase success rate. It proved the right call, though they needed Markram's century to see it through.

Betting & analytical angles

Angles the data surfaced

Observations from the venue data, recent form and historical trends. Editorial context, not betting advice.

  • Top batter markets may be more relevant than outright result lines when both sides feature high-order players capable of centuries; this match produced three in a single game.
  • Venues with low historical averages like Raipur (average first-innings score of 155 across 24 ODIs) can skew totals markets when conditions are more benign than usual.
  • The death-overs phase swung sharply: South Africa's 4 wickets for 80 in overs 41 to 50 suggests that bowling markets and late-match wicket props can be volatile in high-scoring ODIs.
  • Chase success at Raipur stands at 58% over 24 matches, broadly even; outright and innings-based markets may not heavily separate the sides on that factor alone.

For editorial context only. Not a forecast and not betting advice. 18+ only, please gamble responsibly.

Frequently asked

Questions about India Cricket vs South Africa Cricket

Who won the India vs South Africa ODI in Raipur on 3 December 2025?

South Africa won by 4 wickets, successfully chasing India's total of 358 for 5 to finish on 362 for 7. AK Markram was named Player of the Match for his 110 off 98 balls.

How many centuries were scored in the Raipur ODI?

Three centuries were scored across the match. Ruturaj Gaikwad made 105 off 83 balls and Virat Kohli scored 102 off 93 balls for India; AK Markram scored 110 off 98 balls for South Africa in the chase.

What is the head-to-head record between India and South Africa in ODIs?

India lead the all-time ODI head-to-head 60 wins to 50, from 118 completed meetings (8 matches produced no result). India had won three of the four most recent encounters before South Africa's win in Raipur.

Where can I watch India vs South Africa ODIs in the UK?

India-South Africa ODIs are typically broadcast in the UK on Sky Sports Cricket, with streaming available via Sky Go and NOW TV. Check the Sky Sports schedule for exact broadcast times in British Summer Time or GMT.

What was notable about South Africa's chase at Raipur?

The Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Stadium has an average second-innings score of 148 across 24 ODIs. South Africa's 362 for 7 was far beyond the ground's historical norms and is believed to be the highest successful chase at this venue.

Who won the toss and what did they decide?

South Africa won the toss and chose to field first, in line with the venue's historical 58% toss-field preference. The decision proved correct as South Africa went on to win the match.

Photo credits (4)
18+

Gamble responsibly.

LuckySpire is sports media — we compare UK-licensed bookmakers and publish independent editorial. We never take deposits or run a book ourselves.

If you need support

Our standards

  • Only UK-licensed operators appear on LuckySpire
  • All commercial partnerships are clearly labelled
  • Editorial decisions are not influenced by bookmaker relationships