LUCKYSPIRE

Result · Indian Premier League

Rajasthan Royals vs Mumbai Indians

H2H · RR 15–16 MIVenue par · 186Chase success · 56%POTM · YBK Jaiswal

Match preview & overview

Mumbai Indians overhaul 212 to beat Rajasthan Royals by 6 wickets at Wankhede

Mumbai Indians beat Rajasthan Royals by 6 wickets at Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai, on 30 April 2023. Rajasthan batted first after winning the toss and posted 212/7, a total built on a blistering powerplay of 65 runs without loss. Mumbai's chase never looked in serious trouble. They scored 92 runs for just 2 wickets in the middle overs and reached 214/4 to seal the result with deliveries to spare. YBK Jaiswal was named Player of the Match.

The result added another chapter to a rivalry that has produced 31 matches, with Mumbai now holding a 16–15 edge. It was also the second time these sides had met at Wankhede in recent seasons; Rajasthan had won there in 2024 by 6 wickets. This time Mumbai returned the favour.

Pitch report & venue insights

Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai196-match sample

Aggregate conditions from 2003–2026. Numbers that tend to decide matches at this ground — par score, chase success, powerplay averages and toss bias.

196

T20 matches hosted

186

Avg 1st-innings score

171

Avg 2nd-innings score

56%

Chase success rate

46

Avg powerplay runs

73%

Toss-field rate

Head-to-head record

Mumbai Indians lead the series 16–15 from 31 completed matches

Seasons 2007–2026

Series standing

Rajasthan RoyalsRajasthan Royals
15
Mumbai IndiansMumbai Indians
16

31

Total meetings

0

No results

10

In last 10

Recent encounters

Last 10
2026RR won by 27 runs
2025MI won by 100 runs
2024RR won by 9 wickets
2024RR won by 6 wickets
2023MI won by 6 wickets
2022MI won by 5 wickets
2022RR won by 23 runs
2021MI won by 8 wickets
2021MI won by 7 wickets
2020RR won by 8 wickets

Key talking points

Moments the match hinged on

5 angles

Headline angle

Royals post 212/7 on a high-scoring Wankhede surface

Rajasthan Royals elected to bat and made full use of a powerplay that yielded 65 runs without loss. The middle overs cost them 4 wickets for 78, but a death-overs burst of 69 runs from 3 wickets saw them post a competitive 212/7. At a venue where the average first-innings score is 186, they ended well ahead of par.

Angle 02

MI's middle overs were the difference in the chase

Mumbai Indians needed 215 and got there with 4 wickets in hand. The key phase was the middle overs, where they scored 92 runs for 2 wickets. That rate effectively negated Rajasthan's death-over insurance and left MI needing only 64 from the final five overs at the cost of 1 wicket.

Angle 03

Rajasthan's powerplay dominance didn't translate to a win

Rajasthan's 65-run powerplay was 20 runs above Wankhede's venue average of 45. Despite that platform, they won only 15 of their 31 meetings with Mumbai. The match underlined how consistently competitive this fixture is regardless of first-innings dominance.

Angle 04

Jaiswal wins Player of the Match award

YBK Jaiswal was named Player of the Match. His contribution was central to Mumbai's chase, and the award reflected individual impact in a total-team effort that saw MI reach 214/4.

Angle 05

Toss went Rajasthan's way but the chase went Mumbai's

Rajasthan Royals won the toss and chose to bat, a logical call at a venue where 71 per cent of toss winners opt to field. In practice, Wankhede's 55 per cent chase-success rate proved relevant: Mumbai took the chase and won it.

Betting & analytical angles

Angles the data surfaced

Observations from the venue data, recent form and historical trends. Editorial context, not betting advice.

  • Wankhede's chase-success rate of 55 per cent across 196 matches makes toss and batting-order markets worth monitoring at this ground.
  • At a venue averaging 186 first-innings runs, top-batter markets may be more informative than outright result lines given how regularly high totals are posted.
  • With this rivalry level at 16–15 across 31 meetings, outright markets are unlikely to reflect a significant edge for either side.
  • Middle-overs run-rate markets could carry editorial interest at Wankhede, where this chase was effectively decided in overs 7–15.

For editorial context only. Not a forecast and not betting advice. 18+ only, please gamble responsibly.

Frequently asked

Questions about Rajasthan Royals vs Mumbai Indians

What was the result of Mumbai Indians vs Rajasthan Royals on 30 April 2023?

Mumbai Indians won by 6 wickets at Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai. Rajasthan Royals batted first and posted 212/7, and Mumbai chased it down to reach 214/4.

Who won Player of the Match in MI vs RR on 30 April 2023?

YBK Jaiswal was named Player of the Match. His innings was central to Mumbai Indians' successful chase of 215.

What is the head-to-head record between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals?

Across 31 IPL meetings, Mumbai Indians lead 16–15. It is one of the closest rivalries in the competition, with no no-results across all 31 encounters.

Where to watch Mumbai Indians vs Rajasthan Royals in the UK?

IPL matches are broadcast in the UK on Sky Sports Cricket, available via Sky TV, Sky Go, and NOW TV. Check the Sky Sports schedule for the specific match time in British Summer Time.

What happened in the powerplay during this match?

Rajasthan Royals scored 65 runs without losing a wicket in their powerplay, well above Wankhede's venue average of 45. Mumbai Indians replied with 58 runs for 1 wicket in theirs, before dominating the middle overs to set up the win.

Who won the toss in MI vs RR on 30 April 2023?

Rajasthan Royals won the toss and elected to bat. At Wankhede, 71 per cent of toss winners choose to field, so Rajasthan went against the grain. Mumbai successfully chased the total, consistent with the venue's 55 per cent chase-success rate.

Photo credits (4)
18+

Gamble responsibly.

LuckySpire is sports media — we cover UK-licensed bookmakers and publish independent editorial. We never take deposits or run a book ourselves.

If you need support

Our standards

  • Only UK-licensed operators appear on LuckySpire
  • All commercial partnerships are clearly labelled
  • Editorial decisions are not influenced by bookmaker relationships