LUCKYSPIRE

Result · Indian Premier League

Punjab Kings vs Gujarat Titans

H2H · PBKS 4–3 GTVenue par · 211Chase success · 58%POTM · MM Sharma

Match preview & overview

Gujarat Titans chase down 154 at Mohali to beat Punjab Kings by 6 wickets

Gujarat Titans beat Punjab Kings by 6 wickets at the Punjab Cricket Association Stadium in Mohali on 13 April 2023. Punjab Kings posted 153 for 8 after being put in to bat, a total that fell well short of the venue's average first-innings score of 211 across 101 matches. Gujarat's chase was built on a commanding powerplay: 56 for 1 after 6 overs. They never looked troubled, losing only 3 more wickets on the way to the target. MM Sharma was named Player of the Match.

The toss proved influential. Gujarat Titans won it and chose to field, a call consistent with Mohali's tendency: captains opt to field 60% of the time here, and chasing sides win 58% of matches at the ground. Punjab were on the wrong side of both those numbers by the final over.

Pitch report & venue insights

Punjab Cricket Association Stadium, Mohali101-match sample

Aggregate conditions from 2003–2023. Numbers that tend to decide matches at this ground — par score, chase success, powerplay averages and toss bias.

101

T20 matches hosted

211

Avg 1st-innings score

190

Avg 2nd-innings score

58%

Chase success rate

43

Avg powerplay runs

64%

Toss-field rate

Head-to-head record

Punjab Kings lead the series 4–3 from 7 completed matches

Seasons 2022–2026

Series standing

Punjab KingsPunjab Kings
4
Gujarat TitansGujarat Titans
3

7

Total meetings

0

No results

7

In last 7

Recent encounters

Last 7
2026PBKS won by 3 wickets
2025PBKS won by 11 runs
2024GT won by 3 wickets
2024PBKS won by 3 wickets
2023GT won by 6 wickets
2022PBKS won by 8 wickets
2022GT won by 6 wickets

Key talking points

Moments the match hinged on

5 angles

Headline angle

Gujarat won the toss and made it count

Gujarat Titans chose to field after winning the toss, a decision backed by Mohali's 60% toss-field rate and a chase success rate of 58% at the ground. The strategy paid off as GT reached the target of 154 with 6 wickets in hand.

Angle 02

Punjab's death overs cost them dearly

Punjab Kings lost 4 wickets for 54 runs in the death overs (overs 16-20), a collapse that prevented them from posting a par score. Their powerplay contribution of 52 runs from 2 wickets was reasonable, but the back-end damage left the total well below the venue's average first-innings score of 211.

Angle 03

Gujarat's powerplay set the tone for the chase

Gujarat Titans reached 56 for 1 after 6 overs while chasing 154, comfortably ahead of Mohali's average powerplay figure of 41 runs. That platform allowed the middle order to manage the remaining 98 runs without panic, losing just 3 wickets across the final 14 overs.

Angle 04

MM Sharma claimed Player of the Match

MM Sharma was named Player of the Match, reflecting a performance that shaped the outcome. His contribution was the deciding factor in a match where Gujarat never looked like losing after the powerplay.

Angle 05

Head-to-head now level at 4-3 to Punjab Kings

Across 7 meetings between these sides, Punjab Kings hold a 4-3 advantage. Gujarat's win here kept the rivalry competitive, though Punjab's edge in the overall record would later be extended in subsequent seasons.

Betting & analytical angles

Angles the data surfaced

Observations from the venue data, recent form and historical trends. Editorial context, not betting advice.

  • Chasing teams at Mohali win 58% of the time across 101 matches, so toss-and-field strategies tend to carry editorial relevance in pre-match markets here.
  • With Punjab posting 153 against a venue average of 211, top-batter markets for the batting side may have been less predictable than the outright result lines suggested.
  • MM Sharma's Player of the Match award points to individual performance markets having value in fixtures where one player shapes a result across phases.
  • The death-overs phase (4 wickets for 54 runs for Punjab) underlines why bowling phase markets at high-scoring venues can diverge significantly from pre-match expectations.

For editorial context only. Not a forecast and not betting advice. 18+ only, please gamble responsibly.

Frequently asked

Questions about Punjab Kings vs Gujarat Titans

Who won the Punjab Kings vs Gujarat Titans IPL match on 13 April 2023?

Gujarat Titans won by 6 wickets at the Punjab Cricket Association Stadium in Mohali. They chased down Punjab Kings' total of 153 for 8, finishing on 154 for 4.

Who was Player of the Match in this game?

MM Sharma was named Player of the Match. His performance was the standout individual contribution in Gujarat Titans' 6-wicket victory.

What is the head-to-head record between Punjab Kings and Gujarat Titans?

Across 7 IPL meetings, Punjab Kings lead 4-3. Gujarat Titans' win in this April 2023 fixture kept the rivalry tight, though Punjab have since extended their overall advantage in later seasons.

Where can I watch IPL matches in the UK?

IPL matches are broadcast in the UK on Sky Sports Cricket. Streaming is available via Sky Go and NOW TV with a relevant subscription. Coverage typically includes live commentary and highlights.

What did Gujarat Titans score in their powerplay while chasing?

Gujarat Titans scored 56 runs for 1 wicket in their powerplay, which was well above Mohali's ground average of 41 powerplay runs. That strong start effectively settled the chase early.

Why did Punjab Kings score below the venue average at Mohali?

The Punjab Cricket Association Stadium in Mohali has an average first-innings score of 211 across 101 matches. Punjab Kings posted 153 for 8, losing 4 wickets for just 54 runs in the death overs, which restricted their final total.

Photo credits (3)
18+

Gamble responsibly.

LuckySpire is sports media — we cover UK-licensed bookmakers and publish independent editorial. We never take deposits or run a book ourselves.

If you need support

Our standards

  • Only UK-licensed operators appear on LuckySpire
  • All commercial partnerships are clearly labelled
  • Editorial decisions are not influenced by bookmaker relationships